LOGIN
AAOS2019: Network meta-analysis of crosspins vs. cortical buttons vs. interference screws in ACLR
March 2019
AAOS2019: Network meta-analysis of crosspins vs. cortical buttons vs. interference screws in ACLR
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
No Difference in Outcomes between Femoral Fixation Methods with Hamstring Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction – A Network Meta-Analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
11 randomized controlled trials were included in this frequentist network meta-analysis which sought to analyze and compare graft failure rates, knee laxity measures, knee function scores, and incidence of additional procedures between crosspin, cortical button, and interference screw devices for femoral fixation of a hamstring autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The results of...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.