To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Self Administered Questionnaire for reduction of wait times for potential lumbar spinal surgery

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Self Administered Questionnaire for reduction of wait times for potential lumbar spinal surgery

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:17| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The Use of a Self-Administered Questionnaire to Reduce Consultation Wait Times for Potential Elective Lumbar Spinal Surgical Candidates: A Prospective, Pragmatic, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Quality Improvement Study.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):2125-2131.

Contributing Authors:
DM Roffey EK Wai MJ Coyle P Phan SP Kingwell

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

227 patients triaged for a lumbar condition were randomized to receive the standardized triage system (P1 Urgent, P2 Possibly Surgical, P3 Routine Non-urgent) with or without re-triage based on the responses of a 3-item questionnaire (3IQ) to identify leg-dominant symptoms. Responses in the 3IQ could be used upgrade their consultation priority status. Cases with an initial P1 designation upon refe...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue