To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Lower 5-year wear with vitamin-E infused HXLPE liner versus standard crosslinked liner in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2019

Lower 5-year wear with vitamin-E infused HXLPE liner versus standard crosslinked liner in THA

Vol: 8| Issue: 1| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Evaluation of in vivo wear of vitamin E-diffused highly crosslinked polyethylene at five years

Bone Joint J. 2018 Dec;100-B(12):1592-1599. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B12.BJJ-2018-0371.R1

Contributing Authors:
J Karrholm MB Laursen H Malchau C Bragdon M Salemyr B Shareghi VP Galea JW Connelly O Skoldenberg O Muratoglu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

208 patients (221 hips) scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to completion of surgery with either a vitamin E-infused highly crosslinked polyethylene liner (VEPE) or a moderately crosslinked polyethylene liner (ModXLPE). The primary purpose of this study was to compare liner wear via radiographic femoral head penetration between groups at 5-year follow-up. Results demonstrated sign...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue