To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Mobile Bearing vs. Fixed Bearing Implants in TKA for OA on knee function and implant survival

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2018

Mobile Bearing vs. Fixed Bearing Implants in TKA for OA on knee function and implant survival

Vol: 7| Issue: 12| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A randomized prospective study comparing mobile-bearing against fixed-bearing PFC Sigma cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties with ten-year minimum follow-up

Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1336-1344

Contributing Authors:
RP Pitto AJ Powell E Crua BC Chong R Gordon A McAuslan MG Clatworthy

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

167 patients (190 knees) were randomized to receive either a mobile bearing system or a rotating-platform fixed bearing system in a total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Follow-up was performed at 5 and 10 (minimum) years post-surgery. Outcomes reported included seven knee scoring systems (Knee Society Score, Knee Society Functional Score, Oxford Knee Score, Western Ontario ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue