LOGIN
OTA2018: Equivalence not demonstrated, higher union with ICBG vs. rhBMP-2 for open tibial fracture
October 2018
OTA2018: Equivalence not demonstrated, higher union with ICBG vs. rhBMP-2 for open tibial fracture
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing rhBMP-2 Versus Autograft for the Treatment of Tibia Fractures With Critical Size Defects
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
23 patients with an open midshaft tibial fracture fixed with an intramedullary nail were randomized to grafting using a recombinant human morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 supplemented allograft or an autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG). Equivalence of rhBMP-2 to ICBG was tested for radiographic union rate, using an equivalence margin of -20% to +20%. Comparison of groups could not conclude equ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.