To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

SICOT2018: No difference in PROMs, patella crepitus between resurfacing versus retention in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

SICOT2018: No difference in PROMs, patella crepitus between resurfacing versus retention in TKA

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:47| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A COMPARISON OF PATELLA RESURFACING VERSUS RETENTION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR PATIENT SATISFACTION AND PATELLAR CREPITUS AFTER SURGERY

Contributing Authors:
SMJ Mortazavi MH Kaseb H Toofan

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

63 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to either patellar resurfacing or patellar retention. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of patellar crepitus, functional outcome, and patient satisfaction between groups over short-term follow-up. Mean follow-up was 8.68 months postoperatively. Results demonstrated no significant differences between groups in either rat...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.