To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No clear benefit of liposomal bupivacaine over plain bupivacaine for periarticular injection in TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

No clear benefit of liposomal bupivacaine over plain bupivacaine for periarticular injection in TKA

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:23| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Plain Bupivacaine in Periarticular Injection for Control of Pain and Early Motion in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Prospective Study

J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2460-2464 doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.014

Contributing Authors:
BR Hamlin AY Plakseychuk TJ Levison JP Zlotnicki SD Rothenberger KL Urish

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

80 patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty were randomized to periarticular infiltration analgesia completed using either liposomal bupivacaine or plain bupivacaine. Outcomes of interest included pain scores during physical therapy, narcotic consumption, and knee range of motion. Assessment timepoints included 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, and at discharge. While pain scores during physical...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue