To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Improvement in disability did not significantly differ between 3D and 2D planning for DRF malunion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2018

Improvement in disability did not significantly differ between 3D and 2D planning for DRF malunion

Vol: 7| Issue: 10| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Three-Dimensional Compared with Two-Dimensional Preoperative Planning of Corrective Osteotomy for Extra-Articular Distal Radial Malunion: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 18;100(14):1191-1202

Contributing Authors:
JB Jupiter GA Buijze N Leong PM Axelsson R Moreno F Stockmans A Ibsen-Sörensen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

40 patients with a distal radius malunion were randomized to either 3-dimensional (3D) or 2-dimensional (2D) preoperative planning for corrective osteotomy. The primary outcome was the change in patient-reported disability on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire over 12-month follow-up; secondary measures included visual analog scales for pain and satisfaction, the...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue