LOGIN
COA-ACO2018: Lower wound complication rate with sinus tarsi vs lateral extensile approach for DIACFs
June 2018
COA-ACO2018: Lower wound complication rate with sinus tarsi vs lateral extensile approach for DIACFs
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Complications with the Lateral Extensile Approach Versus Sinus Tarsi Approach in Surgery for Displaced Calcaneus Fracture Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Synopsis
Nine studies - randomized controlled trials or cohort studies - were included in this meta-analysis which compared rates of wound complications between the sinus tarsi approach and the standard, lateral extensile approach. The pooled result demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of wound complications following fixation through the sinus tarsi approach compared to the lateral extensile appro...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.