LOGIN
Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation
January 2018
Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trial
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):10Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
82 patients with a displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture were randomized to either minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using closed reduction and percutaneuous plate introduction, or a standard (conventional) approach for open reduction and plate fixation. Patients were assessed for surgical outcomes, length of stay, pain and functional outcome, and radiographic results. Operative time ...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
The OE High Impact metric uses AI to determine the impact a study will have by considering the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances of natural language processing techniques. OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.