Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation
How to Cite
OrthoEvidence. Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation. ACE Report. 2018;7(1):17. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/10050
Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trialJ Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):10
Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
82 patients with a displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture were randomized to either minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using closed reduction and percutaneuous plate introduction, or a standard (conventional) approach for open reduction and plate fixation. Patients were assessed for surgical outcomes, length of stay, pain and functional outcome, and radiographic results. Operative time ...
Continuing Medical Education Credits
You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.LEARN MORE