To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Vol:7 Issue:1 Number:17 ISSN#:2564-2537
DOWNLOAD ESPAÑOL
RCT
ACE Report #10050
Ace Report Cover Trauma

Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation


How to Cite

OrthoEvidence. Surgical and clincial benefit with MIPO vs conventional approach for calcaneal fixation. ACE Report. 2018;7(1):17. Available from: https://myorthoevidence.com/AceReport/Report/10050

Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis versus ORIF for Sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures: a prospective, randomized intervention trial

J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):10

Contributing Authors:
W He C Jin D Weng W Yang W Liang Y Qian

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

82 patients with a displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture were randomized to either minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis using closed reduction and percutaneuous plate introduction, or a standard (conventional) approach for open reduction and plate fixation. Patients were assessed for surgical outcomes, length of stay, pain and functional outcome, and radiographic results. Operative time ...

Ace Report Preview Image
CME Image

Continuing Medical Education Credits

You could be earning 0.5 CME credits for each report you read.

LEARN MORE
For Reprints and Permissions, click here

Please Login or Join to leave comments.