To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

OTA 2016: Suture endobutton versus syndesmotic screw for syndemosis injury

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2016

OTA 2016: Suture endobutton versus syndesmotic screw for syndemosis injury

Vol: 5| Issue: 10| Number:18| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:N/A
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Better clinical and radiographic outcomes with suture endobutton compared to syndesmotic screw in treatment of syndesmotic injuries: a randomized controlled trial

Contributing Authors:
M Andersen F Frihagen J Hellund JE Madsen W Figved

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS

This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.

Synopsis

97 patients with either an isolated syndesmotic injury or concomitant with an AO/OTA type 44C ankle fracture were randomized to syndesmotic stabilization with either a suture endobutton device or a syndesmotic screw. Outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot score, Olerud-Molander score, ankle dorsiflexion and CT-assessed tibifibular distance of the ope...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue