To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

WALANT vs General Anesthesia for Ankle Implant Removal: Improved Early Recovery and Efficiency

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
October 2025

WALANT vs General Anesthesia for Ankle Implant Removal: Improved Early Recovery and Efficiency

Vol: 307| Issue: 10| Number:101| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique versus general anesthesia for the removal of implants after ankle fracture union - A randomized controlled trial.

J Foot Ankle Surg . 2025 Jul-Aug;64(4):462-468.

Contributing Authors:
A Lari M Lari A Alkhandari A Alibrahim A Elaraby N AlEnezi H Almaz M Ibrahim

Synopsis

Fifty-six patients with united ankle fractures requiring implant removal were randomized to receive WALANT (n=28) or general anesthesia (n=28). The primary outcome was pain (11-point VAS) measured repeatedly postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included anxiety (VAS), patient satisfaction, blood loss, operating-room and skin-to-skin times, recovery-room time, and adverse events; wounds were followe...

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue