To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Ramelteon Ineffective in Preventing Post-Op Delirium in Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement

Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
March 2021

Ramelteon Ineffective in Preventing Post-Op Delirium in Patients Undergoing Joint Replacement

Vol: 10| Issue: 3| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Effects of Ramelteon on the Prevention of Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery: The RECOVER Randomized Controlled Trial

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;29(1):90-100.

Contributing Authors:
ES Oh JM Leoutsakos PB Rosenberg AM Pletnikova HS Khanuja RS Sterling JK Oni FE Sieber NS Fedarko N Akhlaghi KJ Neufeld

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Eighty patients scheduled for a hip or knee replacement surgery were randomized to receive oral ramelteon (n=41) or placebo (n=39) for the prevention of post-operative delirium. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of delirium during post-operative day 0 and post-operative day 1-2, as measured by the Aldrete score. Secondary outcomes included the Delirium Rating Scale Revised 98 (DRS-...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue