To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Spinal manipulative therapy offers modest improvements in pain/function with minor MSK harms

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2017

Spinal manipulative therapy offers modest improvements in pain/function with minor MSK harms

Vol: 6| Issue: 10| Number:38| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Association of Spinal Manipulative Therapy With Clinical Benefit and Harm for Acute Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1451-1460

Contributing Authors:
NM Paige IM Miake-Lye MS Booth JM Beroes AS Mardian P Dougherty R Branson B Tang SC Morton PG Shekelle

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Twenty-six (26) randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) compared to either active control comparators or sham treatment in the management of acute low back pain. Observational studies were also included to evaluate the safety of SMT. Results demonstrated significant effects in favour of SMT ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue