To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Loss of spine segmental motion lower with disc prosthesis vs ACDF for disc herniation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

Loss of spine segmental motion lower with disc prosthesis vs ACDF for disc herniation

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:64| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Disc replacement using Pro-Disc C versus fusion: a prospective randomised and controlled radiographic and clinical study

Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):423-30. Epub 2006 Nov 14

Contributing Authors:
A Nabhan F Ahlhelm T Pitzen WI Steudel J Jung K Shariat O Steimer F Bachelier D Pape

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

33 patients with a symptomatic soft disc herniation were randomized to either receive a cervical spine disc prosthesis or anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) as treatment for this condition. this study aimed to comparatively evaluate segmental motion following implantation. The results at the 6 month follow up period indicated that the use of both a disc prosthesis, as well as anterior ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue