LOGIN
Reporting of results appear inadequate and heterogeneous in network meta-analyses
May 2014
Reporting of results appear inadequate and heterogeneous in network meta-analyses
Study Type:Systematic review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
BMJ. 2014 Mar 11;348:g1741. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1741.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
121 network meta-analyses were included in this systematic review to examine the current reporting methodologies. Results revealed an overall inadequacy and heterogeneity in reporting essential components. 100 studies failed to describe the network and network geometry, and 52 and 96 studies failed to report number of RCTs and patients, respectively. 109 studies failed to report the direct and ind...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.