To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Achilles allograft and hamstring autograft comparable in clinical/radiographic outcomes

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2014

Achilles allograft and hamstring autograft comparable in clinical/radiographic outcomes

Vol: 3| Issue: 1| Number:67| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 May;19(5):816-22. doi: 10.1007/s00167-010-1388-6. Epub 2011 Feb 3

Contributing Authors:
JH Noh SR Yi SJ Song SW Kim W Kim

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

74 patients were randomized to compare the clinical and radiographic results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using two procedures: Autogenous hamstring tendon and free tendon Achilles autograft (fixed with EndoButton in the femoral tunnel and Intrafix in the tibial tunnel). The 2 year assessment revealed that the clinical and radiological outcomes between the two procedures were...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue