To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

THA tends to improve function and decrease pain compared to HA for femoral neck fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
August 2013

THA tends to improve function and decrease pain compared to HA for femoral neck fractures

Vol: 2| Issue: 7| Number:267| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the healthy elderly: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials

Int Orthop. 2012 Aug;36(8):1549-60. Epub 2012 May 24

Contributing Authors:
PTPW Burgers AR Van Geene MPJ Van den Bekerom EMM Van Lieshout B Blom IS Aleem M Bhandari RW Poolman

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

This meta-analysis identified 8 randomized trials, comparing the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) or hemiarthroplasty (HA) for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. The primary outcome assessed was the rate of re-operation, with secondary outcomes being mortality and dislocation rate, pain, function and quality of life. Results from the analysis indicated that THA pr...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue