To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Performance improved, but subjective function not altered by direct anterior vs transgluteal THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
February 2019

Performance improved, but subjective function not altered by direct anterior vs transgluteal THA

Vol: 8| Issue: 2| Number:96| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A prospective randomized comparison of the minimally invasive direct anterior and the transgluteal approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Jul 19;19(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2133-4

Contributing Authors:
M Rudert JC Reichert E von Rottkay F Roth T Renz J Hausmann J Kranz L Rackwitz U Nöth

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

148 patients scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomized to either a direct anterior or transgluteal lateral approach. The primary outcome was the number of steps taken per day in the period leading up to 3- and 12-month follow-up. The highlighted secondary outcome measure was the Harris Hip Score, while other secondary outcome measures included the Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assess...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue