Related ACE Reports
- Published: Mar 2017
- ACE Report #9593
AAOS2017: Adductor canal block an effective alternative to FNB in ACL reconstruction
Study Type: Randomized Trial
OE Level of Evidence: N/A
Journal Level of Evidence: N/A
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Why was this study needed now?
Femoral nerve block is a common method for postoperative analgesia following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. However, the effect that femoral nerve block has on motor response has led to more recent studies investigating effective alternatives. The adductor canal block has been suggested as a possible alternative, though the majority of previous research has been conducted in populations undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Therefore, a trial comparing adductor canal block and femoral nerve blocks in ACL reconstruction was needed.
What was the principal research question?
In ACL reconstruction, how do the adductor canal block and femoral canal block compare regarding analgesic efficacy and functional recovery?
|Population:||77 patients scheduled for ACL reconstruction.|
|Intervention:||ACB group: Participants were administered a preoperative adductor canal block.|
|Comparison:||FNB group: Participants were administered a preoperative femoral nerve block|
|Outcomes:||Reported results included postoperative pain, time to the ability to perform straight leg raise, patient satisfaction, analgesic use, and time spent in the recovery room.|
|Methods:||RCT; Single-blinded, Single-center|
|Time:||Patients were followed for 1 week postoperatively.|
What were the important findings?
What should I remember most?
How will this affect the care of my patients?
The authors responsible for this critical appraisal and ACE Report indicate no potential conflicts of interest relating to the content in the original publication.