Related ACE Reports
- Published: Jun 2015
- ACE Report #7889
COA 2015: Internet provided health surveys valid/reliable in pediatric scoliosis patients
Study Type: Randomized Trial
OE Level of Evidence: N/A
Journal Level of Evidence: N/A
CONFERENCE ACE REPORTS
This ACE Report is a summary of a conference presentation or abstract. The information provided has limited the ability to provide an accurate assessment of the risk of bias or the overall quality. Please interpret the results with caution as trials may be in progress and select results may have been presented.
Why was this study needed now?
Health care institutes and professionals are continuously required to adapt their services to changing society and medical knowledge. Another aspect that they adapt to is a technologically advancing world. Traditionally, health care surveys and questionnaires are administered via pen and paper. However, with more and more individuals becoming accustomed to a web-based society, the efficiency of this administration method is being questioned. As a result, the current study aims to assess the validity and reliability of internet administered health related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires in pediatric scoliosis patients.
What was the principal research question?
Is internet administration of Health Related Quality of Life Questionnaires a valid and reliable modality when compared to traditionally pen and paper administration in adolescents with scoliosis?
|Population:||Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and aged 11-18. Each participant was required to complete the Scoliosis Patient Questionnaire: Version 30 (SRS-30) and the Pediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument (PODCI). 96 patients completed follow up.|
|Intervention:||Paper/Internet Group: Questionnaires were initially administered in a paper format, while 2 weeks later, questionnaires were administered via the internet (n=20). Internet/Paper Group: Questionnaires were initially administered via the internet, while 2 weeks later, questionnaires were administered in a paper format (n=26). Internet/Internet Group: At both time points, questionnaires were administered via the internet (n=24).|
|Comparison:||Paper/Paper Group: At both time points, questionnaires were administered in a paper format (n=26).|
|Outcomes:||Outcomes of concern included return rate, participant preference, and survey outcomes.|
|Methods:||RCT: Crossover; Prospective|
|Time:||Questionnaires were to be completed and returned over a 2 week interval. An additional 2 weeks was provided to complete and return the second set of questionnaires.|
What were the important findings?
What should I remember most?
How will this affect the care of my patients?
The authors responsible for this critical appraisal and ACE Report indicate no potential conflicts of interest relating to the content in the original publication.