Showing 1 - 12 of 16 reports matching: Single_v_Double_Row_Rotator_Cuff_Repair
Journals
Specialties
Date of Publication
to
Synopsis: 13 studies analyzing full-thickness rotator cuff tears were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose was to determine how repair method, suture configuration, and tear size effect rotator cuff rerupture rate. The results indicated Read More »
Author verified Level 4 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: Six randomized controlled trials comparing single- and double-row rotator cuff repairs were included in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome of interest was recurrence and the secondary outcomes were functional scores: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score, the Constant shoulder score, and the University of California, Los Angeles score. Pooled findings suggested Read More »
Author verified Level 1 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: 7 level I randomized controlled trials comparing single- and double-row rotator cuff repair were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this review was to compare the clinical and structural outcomes associated with each treatment approach. Pooled data revealed Read More »
Author verified Level 1 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: Nine studies (5 level I evidence and 4 level II evidence) were included in this review which compared the clinical outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Pooled results indicated significant differences in favour of double-row repair when considering re-tear rate, function on the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and range of motion in internal rotation. No significant differences Read More »
Level 2 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: 90 patients with full-thickness supraspinatus tears were randomized to compare tendon healing rates associated with double- and single-row arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair, as determined by ultrasound diagnostics. Patients were evaluated over 17 months and the evidence presented in this study revealed significantly superior tendon healing rates in the double-row group compared to the single-row group. Further evidence of Read More »
Level 2 RCT
Synopsis: 5 (2 cohorts, 3 RCTs) quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials that compared single-row rotator cuff repair with the results of double row rotator cuff repair were selected in the meta-analysis to compare both techniques in function and anatomical superiority. Double-row repair improved tendon healing, provided greater external rotation, and decreased the recurrence rate of tears, but had increased operative time. No statistical differences Read More »
Level 2 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: 6 randomized control trials, 4 prospective cohort studies and 2 retrospective cohort studies comparing functional and clinical effects of single- and double-row repairs of a torn rotator cuff were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The findings stated improved function, decreased pain and increased odds of healing in favour of double-row repairs; however the results were not clinically significant. Also, there were Read More »
Level 2 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: Eight Level I and II publications (6 RCTs and 2 prospective cohort studies) were included in this meta-analysis which compared double-and single-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. The pooled results indicated that functional outcomes measured were superior in those who had received double-row repair, however this was primarily in patients presenting with large tears. Postoperative cuff integrity Read More »
Level 2 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: 71 patients with 2 to 4-cm rotator cuff tears were randomized to receive either an arthroscopic single-row (SR) or double-row (DR) suture anchor repair, to determine potential differences in clinical outcomes and re-tear rates. At 24 month follow-up, the only difference of significance was in mean operative time. Clinical results and Read More »
Level 2 RCT
Synopsis: 53 patients with full thickness rotator cuff tears were randomized to repair using either double or single row anchors. The results at two year follow-up indicate that there were no significant differences in clinical or imaging outcomes. For tears that Read More »
Author verified Level 2 RCT
Synopsis: In this systematic review 7 studies (consisting of 446 participants) examining the functional outcome between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair techniques were evaluated. Results displayed that, Read More »
Level 1 Meta Analysis
Synopsis: 60 patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears were randomized to undergo one of two surgical procedures for rotator cuff repair. One group underwent a single-row suture anchor technique while the second group underwent a double-row suture anchor technique. Results at the Read More »
Level 1 RCT