To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparing tibial titanium porous coating versus porous plasma spray in uncemented TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2017

Comparing tibial titanium porous coating versus porous plasma spray in uncemented TKA

Vol: 6| Issue: 6| Number:4| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of a novel porous titanium construct (Regenerex®) to a well proven porous coated tibial surface in cementless total knee arthroplasty - A prospective randomized RSA study with two-year follow-up

Knee. 2016 Dec;23(6):1002-1011

Contributing Authors:
CL Jensen MM Petersen G Flivik T Lind HM Schrøder CM Jensen NS Winther

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

61 patients scheduled for uncemented total knee arthroplasty were randomized to a novel tibial tray with a porous titanium surface (Vangaurd Regenerex; Zimmer Biomet), or to a tibial tray with porous plasma spray (PPS) surface (Vanguard PPS; Zimmer Biomet). Patients were assessed for component translation and rotation over a 24-month follow-up. No significant difference between groups was observed...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue