To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Clinical advantages at 6-24 mos after tibial IMN with supra- vs. infrapatellar insertion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2017

Clinical advantages at 6-24 mos after tibial IMN with supra- vs. infrapatellar insertion

Vol: 6| Issue: 9| Number:24| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

The outcome comparison of the suprapatellar approach and infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing

Int Orthop. 2016 Dec;40(12):2611-2617

Contributing Authors:
M Cai J Wu R Li Q Sun X Nie J Gong W Ge

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

162 patients scheduled for intramedullary nail fixation following a tibial shaft fracture were randomized to nail insertion via a suprapatellar approach (SPA) or an infrapatellar approach (IFA). Clinical scores and radiological assessment of union, patellofemoral cartilage changes and any incident of articular injury were assessed over a 24-month follow-up. From 6 to 24 months, the SPA group demon...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue