To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Similar changes in clinical & radiographic results after 2 years with IA steroid vs saline

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
January 2017

Similar changes in clinical & radiographic results after 2 years with IA steroid vs saline

Vol: 6| Issue: 1| Number:43| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:N/A
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Safety and efficacy of long-term intraarticular steroid injections in osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb;48(2):370-7

Contributing Authors:
JP Raynauld C Buckland-Wright R Ward D Choquette B Haraoui J Martel-Pelletier I Uthman V Khy JL Tremblay C Bertrand JP Pelletier

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

68 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to be administered intra-articular injections of triamcinolone acetonide (IA corticosteroid) or saline (IA saline) every 3 months for 2 years. The purpose of this study was to compare patient-reported pain, stiffness, and function, patient's and physician global assessment of improvement, knee range of motion, and radiographic joint space narrow...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue