To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intraoperative 3D imaging vs. conventional navigation for pedicle screw placement accuracy

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2017

Intraoperative 3D imaging vs. conventional navigation for pedicle screw placement accuracy

Vol: 6| Issue: 8| Number:19| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Interest of intra-operative 3D imaging in spine surgery: a prospective randomized study

Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1738-44.

Contributing Authors:
P Merloz S Ruatti C Dubois E Chipon G Kerschbaumer M Milaire A Moreau-Gaudry J Tonetti

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

143 patients scheduled for spine surgery were randomized to undergo the procedure with either computer-assisted 3D intra-operative imaging or conventional 2D imaging with the aid of anatomical landmarks. The purpose of this study was to determine if 3D imaging resulted in significantly improved pedicle screw placement accuracy and reduced radiation exposure while maintaining similar operative time...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue