To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

The efficacy & safety of various doses of fulranumab vs placebo for chronic LBP

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2017

The efficacy & safety of various doses of fulranumab vs placebo for chronic LBP

Vol: 6| Issue: 1| Number:21| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fulranumab as an Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With Inadequately Controlled, Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Dose-loading Phase II Study

Clin Ther. 2016 Jun;38(6):1435-50

Contributing Authors:
P Sanga E Polverejan S Wang KM Kelly J Thipphawong

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

389 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic low back pain (LBP) were randomized to receive one of five dose-ranging subcutaneous injection treatments: 1mg fulranumab every 4 weeks, 3mg fulranumab every 4 weeks, 3mg fulranumab every 4 weeks after a 6mg loading dose, 10mg fulranumab every 4 weeks, or placebo every 4 weeks. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of fulran...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue