To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Cranio-cervical flexion similar to cervical proprioception training for chronic neck pain

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
August 2016

Cranio-cervical flexion similar to cervical proprioception training for chronic neck pain

Vol: 5| Issue: 8| Number:28| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of cranio-cervical flexion training versus cervical proprioception training in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial

J Rehabil Med. 2016 Mar 1;48(1):48-55.

Contributing Authors:
TG Izquierdo D Pecos-Martin EL Girbes G Plaza-Manzano RR Caldentey RM Melus DB Mariscal D Falla

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

28 patients with mild to moderate levels of neck pain and disability were randomized to one of two exercise interventions for two months: (1) cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) training or (2) cervical proprioception training. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of the two treatments in terms of pain, function, pain pressure thresholds, or performance on the cranio-cervical flexion te...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue