To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Operative versus nonoperative management of distal radius fracture in elderly patients

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
June 2016

Operative versus nonoperative management of distal radius fracture in elderly patients

Vol: 5| Issue: 6| Number:10| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:3
Journal Level of Evidence:3

Safety and Efficacy of Operative Versus Nonsurgical Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Mar;41(3):404-13

Contributing Authors:
Y Chen X Chen Z Li H Yan F Zhou W Gao

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Two randomized controlled trials and 6 cohort studies (n=858) evaluating the differences between operative and nonoperative treatment of a distal radius fracture in elderly patients were included in this meta-analysis and systematic review. The study was conducted in order to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of either external fixation or open reduction and internal fixation as compa...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue