To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Unilateral vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation for short-segment lumbar spinal fusion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2016

Unilateral vs. bilateral pedicle screw fixation for short-segment lumbar spinal fusion

Vol: 5| Issue: 7| Number:26| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in short-segment lumbar spinal fusion: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Int Orthop. 2016 Feb;40(2):355-64

Contributing Authors:
Z Xin W Li

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 756 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral and bilateral pedicle screw fixation in short-segment lumbar spinal fusion. The findings of this meta-analysis indicated that there is moderate-quality evidence that fusion rates were comparable between unilateral...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue