To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Hyaluronic acid more clinically effective compared to betamethasone for knee OA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
February 2016

Hyaluronic acid more clinically effective compared to betamethasone for knee OA

Vol: 5| Issue: 2| Number:42| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Clinical efficacy of intra-articular injections in knee osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized study comparing hyaluronic acid and betamethasone

Open Access Rheumatology: Research and Reviews 2015:7 9–18

Contributing Authors:
A Trueba Davalillo C C Trueba Vasabilbaso M Navarrete Alvarez J P Coronel Granado M A García Jiménez O M Gimeno del Sol F Gil Orbezo

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

200 patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomized to an intra-articular injection protocol of either hyaluronic acid (HA) or betamethasone (BM), and followed up for a year. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcome measures between HA and BM injections. With the exception of global pain assessment at 3 months, which demonstrated significantly lower pain in the BM group compared...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue