To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Interspinous process device not favorable over decompression for LSS at 2 years

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2015

Interspinous process device not favorable over decompression for LSS at 2 years

Vol: 4| Issue: 12| Number:59| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

IPD without bony decompression versus conventional surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: 2-year results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2295-305

Contributing Authors:
WA Moojen MP Arts WC Jacobs EW van Zwet ME van den Akker-van Marle BW Koes CL Vleggeert-Lankamp WC Peul (SIPS) Leiden The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

159 patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication due to single- or two-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were selected for inclusion. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to determine how treatment with an interspinous process device without bony decompression compared to bony decompression 2 years post-operatively. At 2 years, there was no significant difference betwe...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue