To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intramedullary nail beneficial vs locking compression plate for humeral shaft fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2015

Intramedullary nail beneficial vs locking compression plate for humeral shaft fracture

Vol: 4| Issue: 12| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Management of Humeral Shaft Fractures With Intramedullary Interlocking Nail Versus Locking Compression Plate

Orthopedics. 2015 Sep 1;38(9):e825-9

Contributing Authors:
Y Fan YW Li HB Zhang JF Liu XM Han X Chang XS Weng J Lin BZ Zhang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients presenting with humeral shaft fractures were randomized to undergo surgical fixation with either an intramedullary interlocking nail or locking compression plate. The purpose of the study was to compare operational and functional outcomes of these fixation methods over 1 year postoperatively. The results showed that intramedullary nail led to significantly shorter operative times, hosp...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue