To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Comparison of physical, geriatric & standard rehabilitation in treatment of hip fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
January 2016

Comparison of physical, geriatric & standard rehabilitation in treatment of hip fracture

Vol: 5| Issue: 1| Number:86| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Geriatric and physically oriented rehabilitation improves the ability of independent living and physical rehabilitation reduces mortality: a randomised comparison of 538 patients

Clin Rehabil. 2015 Sep;29(9):892-906

Contributing Authors:
A Lahtinen J Leppilahti S Harmainen J Sipilä R Antikainen ML Seppänen R Willig H Vähänikkilä J Ristiniemi P Rissanen P Jalovaara

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

538 independently-living patients with non-pathological fractures were randomly assigned to receive either physical, geriatric or standard rehabilitation as post-operative therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of each rehabilitation strategy on functional outcomes by comparing the proportion of patients returning to independent living and mortality rates. The results ind...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue