To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Treatment of 3 or 4-part proximal humerus fracture: surgical vs. non-surgical treatment

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
November 2015

Treatment of 3 or 4-part proximal humerus fracture: surgical vs. non-surgical treatment

Vol: 4| Issue: 11| Number:24| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison of Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment of Displaced 3- and 4-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Meta-Analysis

J Invest Surg. 2015 Aug;28(4):215-24.

Contributing Authors:
F Mao DH Zhang XC Peng Y Liao

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

5 randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment of displaced 3 or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus were included in this meta-analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine how patient outcome differed depending on whether a surgical or non-surgical method was used for the treatment of a fracture. Functional outcome was the primary outcome of interest...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue