To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Navigated 'femur-first' vs conventional MIS THA for impingement-free range of motion

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
November 2015

Navigated 'femur-first' vs conventional MIS THA for impingement-free range of motion

Vol: 4| Issue: 11| Number:12| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing 'femur-first' navigation and 'conventional' minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial

Bone Joint J. 2015 Jul;97-B(7):890-8

Contributing Authors:
T Renkawitz M Weber HR Springorum E Sendtner M Woerner K Ulm T Weber J Grifka

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

135 patients scheduled for minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty (THA) were randomized to either a navigated 'femur first' technique or conventional technique. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the proportion of patients displaying CT-based range of motion necessary for activities of daily life (ADL) without prosthetic-bone or prosthetic-prosthetic impingement. Clinical out...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue