To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No added benefit of gentamicin sponges in prevention of infection after hip arthroplasty

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
September 2015

No added benefit of gentamicin sponges in prevention of infection after hip arthroplasty

Vol: 4| Issue: 9| Number:11| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Effectiveness of gentamicin-containing collagen sponges for prevention of surgical site infection after hip arthroplasty: a multicenter randomized trial

Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 15;60(12):1752-9

Contributing Authors:
M Westberg F Frihagen OC Brun W Figved B Grøgaard H Valland H Wangen F Snorrason

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

739 patients with a displaced femoral neck fracture to be treated with hemiarthroplasty were randomized into two groups, which received either routine intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis alone or intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis and local application of 2 gentamicin-containing collagen sponges into the hip joint. The purpose of the study was to determine the efficacy of these sponges in reducing ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue