LOGIN
Drainage versus no drainage following minimally invasive UKA
December 2015
Drainage versus no drainage following minimally invasive UKA
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A
No need for use of drainage after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, controlled trial
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 May;135(5):709-13.Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here
Synopsis
96 patients scheduled for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) were randomized to receive drainage or no drainage after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine if there are any significant differences between drainage and no drainage after UKA for perioperative haematological outcomes or 1-year clinical outcomes. Significant differences were observed for visible blood loss, which w...
To view the full content, login to your account,
or start your 30-day FREE Trial today.
FREE TRIAL
LOGIN
Forgot Password?
Explore some of our unlocked ACE Reports below!
Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature
Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.
Continue
Join the Conversation
Please Login or Join to leave comments.