To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Arthroscopic vs. open Bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocation

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2015

Arthroscopic vs. open Bankart repair for anterior shoulder dislocation

Vol: 4| Issue: 7| Number:15| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

Effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: a meta-analysis of clinical trial data

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Apr;135(4):529-38

Contributing Authors:
L Chen Z Xu J Peng F Xing H. Wang Z Xiang

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

16 trials with 3 randomized controlled trials, 1 quasi-randomized controlled trial, and 12 controlled clinical trials evaluating a total of 827 shoulder treatments were included in this meta-analysis to analyze the effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocations. Pooled results demonstrated that arthroscopic repair resulted in greater...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue