To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Monitored home-exercise program noninferior to clinic-based program for early TKR rehab

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
July 2015

Monitored home-exercise program noninferior to clinic-based program for early TKR rehab

Vol: 4| Issue: 7| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Early rehabilitation after total knee replacement surgery: a multicenter, noninferiority, randomized clinical trial comparing a home exercise program with usual outpatient care

Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2015 Feb;67(2):196-202.

Contributing Authors:
AS Han L Nairn AR Harmer J Crosbie L March D Parker R Crawford M Fransen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

390 patients who had undergone primary unilateral total knee replacement were randomized to receive either a monitored home exercise program or usual rehabilitation care following surgery. This was done to determine whether a home exercise program provided inferior rehabilitation to standard care. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, range of motion, and the 50-foot ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue