To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Demineralized bone matrix vs. B-tricalcium phosphate graft material for ACDF

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
May 2015

Demineralized bone matrix vs. B-tricalcium phosphate graft material for ACDF

Vol: 4| Issue: 5| Number:8| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Bone Union Rate Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Polyetheretherketone Cage: Hydroxyapatite/B-Tricalcium Phosphate Mixture versus Hydroxyapatite/Demineralized Bone Matrix Mixture

Asian Spine J. 2015 Feb;9(1):30-8

Contributing Authors:
J Yi GW Lee WD Nam KY Han MH Kim JW Kang J Won SW Kim W Noh JS Yeom

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

85 patients scheduled for single level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) were randomized to one of two graft materials. PEEK cages of one group were filled with a hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix (HA/DBM) mixture, and in the other group with a hydroxyapatite and beta-tricalcium phosphate (HA/B-TCP) mixture. The purpose of this study was to test the noninferiority of the HA...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue