To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Clinical results favor nonoperative over operative treatment 20 years after burst fracture

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2015

Clinical results favor nonoperative over operative treatment 20 years after burst fracture

Vol: 4| Issue: 4| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:1

Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurological Deficit: A Prospective Randomized Study with Follow-up at Sixteen to Twenty-Two Years

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Jan 7;97(1):3-9

Contributing Authors:
KB Wood GR Buttermann R Phukan CC Harrod A Mehbod B Shannon CM Bono MB Harris

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

47 patients (18-68 years old) with thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological damage were randomized to either operative or nonoperative treatment. Patients were followed-up clinically and radiologically from 17 to 22 years. At final follow-up, the nonoperative group demonstrated significantly better pain and functional outcomes when compared to the operative group. Radiographic results did...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue