To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Autologous blood transfusion drainage vs. no drainage or closed-suction drainage in THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
December 2014

Autologous blood transfusion drainage vs. no drainage or closed-suction drainage in THA

Vol: 3| Issue: 12| Number:5| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta-analysis/Systematic Review
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Comparison between autologous blood transfusion drainage and no drainage/closed-suction drainage in primary total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Nov;134(11):1623-31

Contributing Authors:
N Li P Li M Liu D Wang L Xia

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

12 randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis which focused on postoperative outcomes and complications in patients treated with autologous blood transfusion drainage, closed suction drainage or no drainage following primary total hip arthroplasty. Data on blood loss, transfusion rate, Hb level, hematoma, swelling, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications was cons...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue