To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Efficacy of ACL reconstruction using spinal anesthesia with or without femoral nerve block

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
December 2014

Efficacy of ACL reconstruction using spinal anesthesia with or without femoral nerve block

Vol: 3| Issue: 12| Number:20| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:1
Journal Level of Evidence:1

A prospective double blinded randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstrings tendon and spinal anesthesia with or without femoral nerve block

Knee. 2014 Oct;21(5):911-5.

Contributing Authors:
DC Astur V Aleluia C Veronese N Astur SG Oliveira GG Arliani R Badra CC Kaleka JT Amaro M1 Cohen

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

32 patients with a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and scheduled for reconstruction under spinal anaesthesia were randomized to the procedure with and without a femoral nerve block. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between the two groups up to 7 days postoperatively. Patients who received the femoral nerve block had significantly decreased pain during the fir...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue