To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Surgical outcomes better with PFN vs. DHS in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
April 2015

Surgical outcomes better with PFN vs. DHS in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures

Vol: 4| Issue: 4| Number:56| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Meta analysis
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Proximal femoral nail vs. dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: a meta-analysis

Med Sci Monit. 2014 Sep 12;20:1628-33

Contributing Authors:
K Zhang S Zhang J Yang W Dong S Wang Y Cheng M Al-Qwbani Q Wang B Yu

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

Six prospective studies were included in this meta-analysis investigating the efficacy of proximal femoral nails (PFN) and dynamic hip screws (DHS) in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. Meta-analysis was performed of data on operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, infection rate, lag screw cut-out rate, and reoperation rate. Results demonstrated shorter operative time...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue