To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

No difference between cemented and hybrid component fixation in Rotaglide TKA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
November 2014

No difference between cemented and hybrid component fixation in Rotaglide TKA

Vol: 3| Issue: 11| Number:2| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:2

The Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: no difference between cemented and hybrid implantation

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1843-8

Contributing Authors:
M Iosifidis E Iliopoulos D Neofytou N Sakorafas D Andreou D Alvanos A Kyriakidis

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

100 patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis were randomized to undergo total knee arthroplasty with either cemented or hybrid fixation (cementless femoral fixation/cemented tibia component). The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal fixation method of Rotaglide mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty with respect to survival and revision rates, clinical, and radiological outcomes. ...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue