To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Operative vs nonoperative care of closed, displaced, intraarticular calcaneal fractures

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2014

Operative vs nonoperative care of closed, displaced, intraarticular calcaneal fractures

Vol: 3| Issue: 9| Number:82| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Operative versus non-operative treatment for closed, displaced, intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus: randomised controlled trial

BMJ. 2014 Jul 24;349:g4483. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g4483.

Contributing Authors:
D Griffin N Parsons E Shaw Y Kulikov C Hutchinson M Thorogood SE Lamb UK Heel Fracture Trial (UK HeFT) investigators

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

One hundred and fifty one patients with a recent (<3 weeks) closed, intra-articular, displaced calcaneal fracture were randomized to either operative or nonoperative treatment. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of operative treatment after 2 years. Results indicated that there were no treatment effects for Kerr-Atkins scores, as well as for SF-36 scores, EQ-5D scores, American Orthopaedic...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue