To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Addition of static progressive stretch device to physical therapy for adhesive capsulitis

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
September 2014

Addition of static progressive stretch device to physical therapy for adhesive capsulitis

Vol: 3| Issue: 9| Number:77| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Efficacy of a static progressive stretch device as an adjunct to physical therapy in treating adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective, randomised study

Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.08.006. Epub 2013 Oct 3.

Contributing Authors:
M Ibrahim R Donatelli M Hellman J Echternach

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

60 patients (60 shoulders) with a diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder were randomized to traditional therapy either combined with the use of a static progressive stretch device, or to traditional therapy alone. The efficacy of the device was evaluated with respect to clinical and functional outcomes up to 1 year. Results indicated that range of motion significantly improved in the sta...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue