To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Better left ventricular function and MAP with xenon vs. propofol in non-cardiac surgery

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Author Verified
Ace Report Cover
October 2014

Better left ventricular function and MAP with xenon vs. propofol in non-cardiac surgery

Vol: 3| Issue: 10| Number:69| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Randomized Trial
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Xenon or propofol anaesthesia for patients at cardiovascular risk in non-cardiac surgery

Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):605-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen050. Epub 2008 Mar 15.

Contributing Authors:
JH Baumert M Hein KE Hecker S Satlow P Neef R Rossaint

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

40 patients with, or at risk for, coronary artery disease and undergoing non-cardiac surgery were randomized to receive either a xenon-opioid anaesthetic or propofol-opioid anaesthetic. The purpose of this study was to compare these two interventions with respect to the preservation of left ventricular function, as well as intraoperative mean arterial pressure. Results indicated that xenon yielded...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue