To unlock this feature and to subscribe to our weekly evidence emails, please create a FREE orthoEvidence account.

SIGNUP

Already Have an Account?

Loading...
Visit our Evidence-Based Covid-19 Website and Stay Up to Date with the latest Research.
Ace Report Cover

Intravenous metamizole has a greater analgesic efficacy than paracetamol following THA

Download
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Share
Reprints
Cite This
About
+ Favorites
Ace Report Cover
July 2014

Intravenous metamizole has a greater analgesic efficacy than paracetamol following THA

Vol: 3| Issue: 7| Number:74| ISSN#: 2564-2537
Study Type:Therapy
OE Level Evidence:2
Journal Level of Evidence:N/A

Treatment of postoperative pain after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between metamizol and paracetamol as adjunctive to opioid analgesics-prospective, double-blind, randomised study

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 May;134(5):631-6. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-1979-7. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Contributing Authors:
Z Oreskovic G Bicanic P Hrabac B Tripkovic D Delimar

Did you know you're eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report? Click Here

Synopsis

94 patients scheduled to undergo total hip arthroplasty were randomized to receive patient-controlled morphine paired with either intravenous metamizole or paracetamol as the postoperative analgesic regimen. The purpose of this study was to compare these two pharmacological interventions with respect to analgesic efficacy over the first 24 postoperative hours. Results indicated that patients in th...

CME Image

Did you know that you’re eligible to earn 0.5 CME credits for reading this report!

LEARN MORE

Join the Conversation

Please Login or Join to leave comments.

Learn about our AI Driven
High Impact Search Feature

High Impact Icon

Our AI driven High Impact metric calculates the impact an article will have by considering both the publishing journal and the content of the article itself. Built using the latest advances in natural language processing, OE High Impact predicts an article’s future number of citations better than impact factor alone.

Continue